THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added:
FS#182 - replace standard by smart pointers User who did this - Christoph Grüninger (gruenich) ---------- That new code looks great. A lot more like Java and less I-get-my-hands-dirty-with-memory work. But: - Why is Problem *problemPtr_; still not a smart pointer? You just added zero initialization for it. - Could you separately commit unrelated changes like the superfluous semicolons in dumux/linear/domesticoverlapfrombcrsmatrix.hh please? - Which compiler are supported with the smart pointer? Are there any problems known with older (gcc) compilers that we would like to support? At least I am not aware of any with gcc 4.5 or newer. ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://www.dumux.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&task_id=182#comment311 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above. _______________________________________________ Dumux mailing list [email protected] https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
