THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added:
FS#180 - Inconsistent naming - special status of saturation User who did this - Bernd Flemisch (bernd) ---------- That reminds me of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmnyylNdHBA ;-) Let us try to be constructive. There are three options on the table (which might need to be rephrased), all starting with \"We use camelCase with a uncapitalized first letter for the naming of class members.\" Option 1 (words): \"If a part of the name consists of a word and succeeding words that would be sub- or superscripted in \'normal\' writing, these succeeding words are not capitalized.\" Option 2 (characters): \"If a part of the name consists of a character and succeeding characters that would be sub- or superscripted in \'normal\' writing (and do not form a meaningful word themselves), these succeeding characters are not capitalized.\" Option 3 (character followed by words): \"If a part of the name consists of a single character and succeeding words that would be sub- or superscripted in \'normal\' writing, these succeeding words are not capitalized.\" Can we vote for one of the three options? Or put other cristal-clearly formulated options on the table? ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://www.dumux.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&task_id=180#comment347 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above. _______________________________________________ Dumux mailing list [email protected] https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
