Hi Shawn, good to hear from you again.
Can you send the problem file you use? Or, if you did not change too much, a complete diff against a Dumux stable version? Kind regards Bernd On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:35:29 -0400 "Shawn Zhang" <[email protected]> wrote: >Resending with lower resolution image to honor the email size limit and with >the right format. Thanks Christoph. > >_____________________________________________ >From: Shawn Zhang [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 09:55 >To: [email protected] >Subject: Large nonphysical non-wetting fluid satuation near outlfow boundary > > >Hi Dear Dumux Experts, > >While running a simple decoupled 2p example, I noticed large saturation >numbers near outflow boundary, e.g., 44.5, which are completely unphysical. >I attached below a screenshot illustrating this observation. > >I tested the outlet with both outflow boundary condition and Dirichlet >boundary condition, with the same results. > >If I visualize only the data between 0 and 1, the results appear to be >reasonable in the rest of domain. > >Have you seen this in the past? Can I just remove those boundary cells when >I compute additional parameters? > >Your advice and guidance will be greatly appreciated. > >Best, >Shawn > _______________________________________________________________ Bernd Flemisch phone: +49 711 685 69162 IWS, Universitaet Stuttgart fax: +49 711 685 67020 Pfaffenwaldring 61 email: [email protected] D-70569 Stuttgart url: www.hydrosys.uni-stuttgart.de _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Dumux mailing list [email protected] https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
