Hi Georg,
the difference between the two functions is, that 12 evaluates the
coupling for and based on the boundary conditions given for the Darcy
domain. 21 does it for the Stokes domain. I think there should be no
problem to do this in one function (they are only called once and this
directly after each other).
Best regards,
Thomas
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Dipl. Ing. Thomas Fetzer
Institut für Wasser- und Umweltsystemmodellierung (IWS)
Lehrstuhl für Hydromechanik und Hydrosystemmodellierung
Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 61, 70569 Stuttgart
Email: [email protected]
Telefon: 0049-711-685-60103 ** fax: 0049-711-685-60430
http://www.hydrosys.uni-stuttgart.de
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Am 11/10/2014 um 03:55 PM schrieb [email protected]:
Hi Dumux experts,
Does anyone know why there are 2 evalCoupling-functions (12 and 21) in
the localoperator.hh files?
As far as I understand it, this could also be done in one function and
the separation in 2 functions does not make sense to me since we are
considering one common interface. Can anyone please explain?
Best regards
Georg Futter
——————————————————————————
*German Aerospace Center *(DLR)
Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics | Computational Electrochemistry
| Pfaffenwaldring 38-40 | 70569 Stuttgart
Dipl.-Ing. *Georg Futter* | Ph.D. student
Telefon 0711/6862-8135 | [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
www.DLR.de <http://www.dlr.de/>
_______________________________________________
Dumux mailing list
[email protected]
https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
_______________________________________________
Dumux mailing list
[email protected]
https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux