Presumably, if you had permission to expose or describe a route from a peer, and that route was not received by that peer from someone else through the peering network, then that would represent a separate permission outside of the GPA and would not be covered since it really isn't being handled through the peering network. A simple test would be "Is this something I would have the capability and authorization to do if I don't have access to the peering network at all?" and if the answer is yes, then it is unlikely to be in conflict with the GPA.
Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Messina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 8:29:04 AM (GMT-0600) America/Guatemala Subject: [Dundi] DUNDi GPA, Section 2(f) Hello, I'm hoping someone will help me be able to answer a question about the GPA Section 2(f) which deal with the sharing of Routes, Service and Participant information. Does this section mean that I am not able to say (on a public webpage for example): "There is a peer in Some Town, USA which terminates E.164 numbers in the +1777NXXXXXX area code space?" Does the same apply, even if I have the permission of that peer to do so? So you can see what I have done currently to work around this, visit http://messinet.com/project/dundi Thanks for your help. -- Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- Dundi mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/dundi
