And then again, you might up performance a bit by directing your browser cache to a
RAM disk and using a cardbus (32-bit) pc card modem. Still you might have done this
already... Other than that a fat modern HD really will make your 2400 behave in a new
way: fast, almost silent, and with a considerably lower power debt when on the road.
But thatt�s about it: comparing to the Pismo is a no-go just the same.


Patrick Selliers


Clark Martin wrote:

> At 10:46 PM -0500 3/26/2003, Matt Halter wrote:
> >I would guess: Faster Processing speed, faster bus speed, faster
> >video card/ram, not necessarily in that order.
> >
> >On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 07:36  PM, Robert Johnstone wrote:
> >
> >>Can anyone explain why my PB2400 using a modem at the same speed as my
> >>Pismo (56k) seems to surf the internet at a much slower speed?
>
> Don't forget hard disk speed.  Web browsers all cache pages to disk
> which means they are constantly writing to disk.  Also in no
> particular order
> --
> Clark Martin
> Redwood City, CA, USA
> Macintosh / Internet Consulting
>
> "I'm a designated driver on the Information Super Highway"
>


----------
Duo/2400 List, The friendliest place on the Net!
A listserv for users and fans of Mac subportables.
FAQ at <http://www.themacintoshguy.com/lists/DuoListFAQ.shtml>
Be sure to visit Mac2400! <http://www.sineware.com/mac2400>

To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Need help from a real person? Try.  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

----------
Dr. Bott  | 10/100 Ethernet for your 2400 is finally here!
MPC-100   | <http://www.drbott.com/prod/mpc100.html>

  RoadTools $30 PodiumPad available at Apple retail stores, $20 Traveler
  CoolPad at Staples. Both in white for iBooks at <http://roadtools.com>

Midwest Mac Parts  ][  <http://www.midwestmac.com>
After-market parts  for Macs.   ][  888-356-1104 ][

MacResQ Specials: LaCie SCSI CDR From $99! PowerBook 3400/200 Only $879!
Norton AntiVirus 6 Only $19! We Stock PARTS! <http://www.macresq.com>

Reply via email to