I just wanted to say that I had one with 9.2 but after a while the P-book
started to crash way too often. So I backed everything upp and installed 9.1
and everything was good again
From: Greg Glazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "A place to discuss Apple's sub-portable computers."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "A place to discuss Apple's sub-portable computers."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [DuoList] Installing OS 9.2 on pb 2400
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:05:12 -0700
On Nov 26, 2004, at 9:27 AM, Sid Barras wrote:
I bought one recently that had OS 9.2 already installed, and it seems to
run fine; in fact maybe even a bit zippier than OS 9.1. And am I mistaken
in thinking that 9.2 might have better native support for USB type
devices? (The machine is cardbus enabled, and I do use USB printers and
stuff. But I would like it to run just a bit faster, and I've already got
the 96mb RAM chip installed.
I believe that one needs a utility program to help enable the 9.2 OS to be
installed, but I am unable to find anything that looks like that on this
machine that has the 9.2 installed, so I assume it runs in the background
or goes away once the software is installed.
Would it be a worthwhile installation, or is it going to consume
unecessary precious RAM? (I do have RAM doubler installed too...)
Thanks for any info.
9.2 won't run anything any faster than 9.1 on a 2400C. The only difference
is that 9.2 improved performance in the Classic environment of Mac OS X. If
you're not running OS X, (or even if you *are*) don't worry about it.
Life's too short. :-)
--
Greg Glazier
The 2400C Doc
send all direct replies to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
DuoList mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/duolist
_______________________________________________
DuoList mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/duolist
