Hello Michael:

I used a Mac Plus for two years and found it satisfactory. I 
designing a house using MiniCad, ran structural calculation 
spreadsheets using Excel, programmed various Hypercard databases and 
wrote many reports and letters with MS Word on that machine! It had 4 
mb RAM and a second, external floppy drive. I remember with some 
nostalgia how pleasant it was to work without the constant whine of a 
hard drive.

If your can find a supply of upgraded Pluses i.e. 4 mB RAM and a 
small (internal) hard drive, those machines should work nicely for 
word processing. Otherwise I'd look for Classics or SE/30s. You can't 
use the current OS or the latest application software, but then that 
could be an advantage. The earlier OSes were simpler, faster and I 
don't recall having anywhere near the stability problems with my old 
Plus that I have now. And early versions of application software can 
likely be picked up for free.

Still, Paul Nelson's suggestion you talk to lowendmac.com before you 
decide is good advice.

Incidently, I taught writing in an earlier life and I have always 
thought the computer could be a useful writer's aid. Unfortunately, 
at that time the PC didn't exist!

Good Luck: Douglas Wagner
-- 
http://members.home.net/dwagner-com
Developer: Filemaker, Valentina/Applescript/FaceSpan, Hypercard 
----------
Duo/2400 List, The friendliest place on the Net!
A listserv for users and fans of Mac subportables.
FAQ at <http://www.themacintoshguy.com/lists/DuoListFAQ.shtml>
Be sure to visit Mac2400! <http://www.sineware.com/mac2400>

 XRouter | Share your DSL or cable modem between multiple computers! 
Dr. Bott | Now $199.99      <http://www.drbott.com/prod/MIH120.html>

PowerBook Guy is          |      Click here!
Everything PowerBook!     |      http://www.powerbookguy.com

Midwest Mac Parts  ][  <http://www.midwestmac.com>  
After-market parts  for Macs.   ][  888-356-1104 ][

MacResQ Reader Specials: 2.5GB Seagate SCSI: $119, 4GB IBM SCSI: $199, 
Norton Util. 4.0: $29, Mac Parts, Systems & Repairs <http://www.macresq.com>

 

Reply via email to