Question #150909 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150909
Status: Answered => Open
ceg is still having a problem:
uh, so duplicity is no chunky bacon. ;-)
Doing unnecessary full backups of hundreds of GB if only a couple MB have
changed is just too unfortunate.
But having all data stored in a single data stream that causes everything
behind a single corruption to be lost, well, many thanks edso for pointing that
out!
Shouldn't duplicity chunk the files to volumes first and then compress
and gpg them?
Well, probably just switch from using .tar to .dar for various reasons.
Dar seems much better then .tar and already supports reduncancy
checksumming etc.
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for Duplicity.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
Post to : duplicity-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
