On 2 November 2011 11:46, Kenneth Loafman <[email protected]> wrote: >> C) I would be interested to start working on expanding the duplicity >> test suite and making more of the current tests require no >> configuration. I'm assuming such changes would be welcome? > > Yes, very welcome! Plus convert the shells to Python, etc.
I've made some good progress on revamping most of the test suite to not require root or any gpg configuration (lp:~mterry/deja-dup/test-reorg). I'm not done yet, but I wanted to ask about a test. I've hit a test failure I don't understand in pathtest.py's test_compare() test. It ends up comparing two different Path objects, which will always return False in Python when those objects don't define a new __cmp__ or __eq__ or such. And Path doesn't. I don't know how this test, as written, is supposed to work. Does it make sense to you, Ken? -mt _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
