On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Michael Terry <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 30 March 2012 21:17, Michael Terry <[email protected]> wrote: > > If Ubuntu really wants to push for 12.10, I suspect they'll be willing > > to carry a patch for at least one cycle as long as the patch isn't a > > dead-end. Which means as an upstream, you wouldn't have to abandon > > RHEL 5 just yet. > > Heh, sorry for the flurry of replies. I also wanted to stress that > Ubuntu wouldn't want to force the transition before you're ready (i.e. > doesn't want to force dropping support for RHEL 5 if you'd rather keep > it). > > It'd likely be my job to maintain any such Python 3 patch on top of > duplicity, which I'm willing to do until ya'll are ready for it. > No problem on the number of replies. You were able to answer most of my questions as I read through them. So, to get this straight, we may be able to supply a 3.2 patch in the Ubuntu release, yet supply 2.4 code for everyone else? That is still a second version unless I'm missing something very subtle. No real objections during the transition time, but I'll want to pull those together ASAP. ...Ken
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
