Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 16.04.2012 21:30, Chris Stankaitis wrote:
> New question #193846 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
>
> I am backing up files from one RAID array to a 2nd (local disk) I.E. from
> /dev/sdb to /dev/sdc and I am seeing very excessive backup times. This is
> causing me to be unable to run daily incremental backups.
>
...
> What if anything can I do to speed this up?
>
> The --asynchronous-upload flag as been marked as experimental for about as
> long as I have been using duplicity (3 years or so) is this still very risky?
> has the code been fixed and the docs not updated to reflect? what are the
> risks to using this flag?
>
> Running on
>
> RHEL6 x86_64
> duplicity 0.6.17
>
>
please try 0.6.18 and see if the issue persists.
--asynchronous-upload wil probably stay marked experimental as long as
nobody comes forward reporting it works flawlessly.. i for one use it
since it's inception and never had issues. how about you?
..ede/duply.net
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for Duplicity.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
Post to : duplicity-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
