On 16 April 2014 09:30, Kenneth Loafman <[email protected]> wrote: > Not sure I like the idea of a mock backend. I'm thinking more along the > lines of a duplicity API doc for backends that handles get, put, list, del, > etc., where our wrapper would handle any retries so that those would be the > primitives, not the full implementation. We'd then have a way to put out a > series of test cases for a new backend that would test separately from > duplicity. >
I also want that too. A lot of the code in backend is duplicate logic. And I like the idea of a little manual test script that backend authors can use to validate their code. -mt
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
