A+ for effort ;) .. we should probably make that a 0.7 release, stating that there might be some hickups (bugs) due to major code revision. two more comments below..
On 28.04.2014 04:55, Michael Terry wrote: SNIP > > > === modified file 'bin/duplicity' > --- bin/duplicity 2014-04-19 19:54:54 +0000 > +++ bin/duplicity 2014-04-28 02:49:55 +0000 > @@ -289,8 +289,6 @@ > > def validate_block(orig_size, dest_filename): > info = backend.query_info([dest_filename])[dest_filename] > - if 'size' not in info: > - return # backend didn't know how to query size this could raise a key not found error. can you really guaratee the key will be there? > size = info['size'] > if size is None: > return # error querying file > > === modified file 'duplicity/backend.py' > --- duplicity/backend.py 2014-04-25 23:53:46 +0000 > +++ duplicity/backend.py 2014-04-28 02:49:55 +0000 > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ SNIP > > # These URL schemes have a backend with a notion of an RFC "network > location". > # The 'file' and 's3+http' schemes should not be in this list. > @@ -69,7 +74,6 @@ > uses_netloc = ['ftp', > 'ftps', > 'hsi', > - 'rsync', > 's3', > 'scp', 'ssh', 'sftp', > 'webdav', 'webdavs', any reason why you removed rsync here? ..ede -- https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/duplicity/backend-unification/+merge/216764 Your team duplicity-team is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-unification into lp:duplicity. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
