Question #248111 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/248111
Rodrigo Alvarez gave more information on the question: Ok, I created a test set with 150K files (very small files) to test the theory. On May 11, 2014, at 10:03 AM, Rodrigo Alvarez <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Edso, > > Nice theory! I hadn't noticed that after the 92K file threshold all other > files are added again. > > I'm currently running Python 2.7.3--supposedly the latest production version > for Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. Are you recommending that I roll back to the retired > Python 2.6.6? I could also try upgrading to 2.7.6. Reading around, it > seems fiddling with Python version switches is a very good way to ruin your > system. Can you think of any test to confirm the theory before going for the > down/up-grade? > > Best, > > +R > > > On May 11, 2014, at 3:26 AM, edso <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Your question #248111 on Duplicity changed: >> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/248111 >> >> edso posted a new comment: >> Rodrigo, >> >> ignore the previous request, just saw you earlier comment. >> >> here comes a thought. the second backup log suggests that after roughly >> 92000 files the files get compared to None, meaning they seem to be >> missing in the backup. the earlier verify though pretty clearly says >> they are in there. >> >> i remember an issue on Mac where python had a bug that silently capped >> array lists to some maximum length. >> >> can you try another python? preferrably latest stable of 2.6 ? >> >> ..ede/duply.net >> >> -- >> You received this question notification because you asked the question. > -- You received this question notification because you are a member of duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for Duplicity. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
