Question #263976 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/263976
edso proposed the following answer: On 22.03.2015 15:41, Marco B. wrote: > Question #263976 on Duplicity changed: > https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/263976 > > Marco B. posted a new comment: > Dear all, > > thank you for your help. I ran a collection-status with verbose level 9, > using an external drive as a temporary dir so that the operation could > complete. I didn't run a verify because the behaviour seems to be the > same, and a verify would take hours. > > Here is a shortened version of the output log; you can find the full log > here: http://pastebin.com/XUQBZ5da . (I managed to make it speak > English, so this is untranslated.) > nice catch, looks like the fetch routines really create two temp files. one in backend.get_fileobj_read(...) the other in it's caller a little bit later under duplicity.sync_archive(...).copy_to_local(...) will have to have a closer look to decide the necessity and come up with a fix as probably necessary. please create a bug ticket for this and link it to your question. thanks ede/duply.net -- You received this question notification because you are a member of duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for Duplicity. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
