Hi Aaron, OK, 0.7.08 has been released, the 0.8 branch has been updated. Go ahead and make the changes you suggested.
...Thanks, ...Ken On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Kenneth Loafman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > Thanks for the offer. I'll take you up on it after I release 0.7.08 this > week. > > The 0.8 branch is actually behind 0.7 at the moment. After the release, > I'll bring it up-to-date. We'll start 0.8 based on 0.7.08. > > The 0.6 branch is still in use by LTS systems, Ubuntu, RedHat, others. > The only thing we can do is to suggest they upgrade. I've had one person > that could not upgrade using anything other than the "official" repository, > so I'm thinking that situation is fairly rare. At least, I hope it is. > > ...Ken > > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Aaron <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Ken, >> >> I'm happy to help tidy up Launchpad etc (e.g. repoint lp:duplicity, >> change branch descriptions), but I want to make sure that we are agreed on >> the approach. >> >> If we have EOLed 0.6, my sense is that we need 0.7 to become "Stable" >> (bug fixes only) and 0.8 to become the main "Development"/lp:duplicity >> branch. Does that sound sensible? >> >> I have only developed against the 0.7 branch so far -- is there anything >> half-baked in the 0.8 series that would prevent us using that one as the >> main branch going forward? >> >> Thanks again, >> >> Aaron >> >> >> >> On 13/06/16 12:18, Kenneth Loafman wrote: >> >> Looks like I have more things to munge. >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Aaron <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ken, >>> >>> Should we be moving to committing to the 0.8 branch by default, with >>> only bug fixes to 0.7? Last time I tried, 0.7 was the default/mainline for >>> bzr branch lp:duplicity etc. >>> >>> https://code.launchpad.net/duplicity >>> >>> >>> lists 0.8 as Experimental, with 0.7 (and 0.6) as Development. We should >>> probably also update README-REPO if 0.6 is now EOL, as that refers to 0.6 >>> as the stable branch. >>> >>> As always, thanks for your work shepherding the project. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Aaron >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2016-06-12 19:03, Kenneth Loafman wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This is to announce that the 0.6 series has reached End-Of-Life. No >>> further updates or upgrades will be made to it. The long term support >>> folks can easily upgrade to the tarball version >>> <https://launchpad.net/duplicity/+download>, the Daily PPA >>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team/+archive/ubuntu/daily>, or the >>> Stable >>> PPA <https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa>, >>> depending on their needs. >>> >>> The 0.7 series will continue while we work on 0.8 with an eye to ever >>> larger backups and split signature files. >>> >>> We would love to work with the distros to figure out how to assist in >>> their long term support needs, but currently we are at odds with how >>> development is done. We do not have time to maintain dozens of different >>> versions dependent on the vagaries of each of the distros, while at the >>> same time adding new features. Heck, we don't even have the time to >>> maintain the half-dozen or so versions that Ubuntu would need. So, >>> progress will be made, but if you want or need to stick with the >>> distribution repository for whatever reason, we'll try to help, but the >>> most common response will be to upgrade to one of the above. >>> >>> ...Thanks, >>> ...Ken >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
