Question #660463 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/660463
Status: Open => Answered edso proposed the following answer: On 11/11/2017 14:53, Konstantin Schubert wrote: > Question #660463 on Duplicity changed: > https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/660463 > > Konstantin Schubert gave more information on the question: > > I've got a few more questions. If the mailing list isn't the right place for > them, let me know. > > First off, I want to say that I have high respect of code that is time > proven and works, even if it's not written in the latest greatest > language :) > > That being said, I still think that I'd be able to make some careful > contributions. > > My first question: > Would it be acceptable to raise the minimum required python version to 2? > > Second question: > My impression is that the dup_time module is mainly used for parsing file > names into an internal time representation and vice versa. Therefore, no > matter what changes I make here, I'll have to be very careful not to break > backwards compatibility in parsing the file names. > > I'd probably start working by writing tests for all the file name formats > that need to be covered and then ask here on the list for confirmation that > the tests are exhaustive. > Afterwards, I can start work on refactoring the module by making use of > datetime and pytz. > > Does that sound reasonable? > Konstantin, it does. i am wondering tough why you want to rewrite a perfectly functioning part of duplicity when there are bugs and feature request en masse on launchpad already. just a tought. ..ede/duply.net -- You received this question notification because your team duplicity-team is an answer contact for Duplicity. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : duplicity-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp