On 30.04.2018 11:22, Tim wrote: > Question #668404 on Duplicity changed: > https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/668404 > > Status: Answered => Open > > Tim is still having a problem: > Yes, atime is a filesystem feature. But it is possible to > programatically read and store the original atime, then read the file, > then restore the original atime — using utimes() — such that atime > effectively does not change. I am wondering if Duplicity 'preserves' > the original atime in such a manner. >
given the age of the original source i'd guess not. if you really want to know you can easily check the sources yourself, or easier create a test dataset. back it up and check atimes before and after. @Ken: do you know it off the top of your head? ..ede/duply.net _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
