> > > I'm going to merge this in soon unless there are objections. > > > > Yes, sounds good. I have run a few tests and have not found anything > > problematic (just that same code lint failure you noted). Given the > extensive > > changes, I would like to test the new tests against the old code and vice > > versa to make sure we haven't had anything creep into both the tests and > code > > simultaneously. > > Running the new tests against the trunk gives a few failures, but I think > these all make sense: > https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/rwFbHfGJsP/
And here are the results of this code against the old tests. Again, a handful of failures, but I think these make sense too, given what failed the other way around: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/txkByn4Qws/ So I'm happy for it to be merged if you are, Ken. Thank you very much for this, Mike. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~mgorse/duplicity/0.8-series/+merge/359864 Your team duplicity-team is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~mgorse/duplicity/0.8-series into lp:duplicity. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
