Question #689178 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/689178
Kenneth Loafman posted a new comment: https://www.google.com/search?q=ValueError%3A+error%3A060800A3%3Adigital+envelope+routines%3AEVP_DigestInit_ex%3Adisabled+for+fips&oq=ValueError%3A+error%3A060800A3%3Adigital+envelope+routines%3AEVP_DigestInit_ex%3Adisabled+for+fips&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58j69i61.1581j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Following that link will show you the mess that the hashlib is in. I'm not sure at this point which direction the software will take. Redhat/Centos added an argument to allow use in non-secure manner, but that's only a small part of the equation since that is not standard across the majority of Linux. Going to make a bug report out of it and see if we can get some non- invasive answers. Changing from md5/sha1 to something stronger makes no sense since they are not being used for security and would be backwards incompatible. -- You received this question notification because your team duplicity-team is an answer contact for Duplicity. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
