Michael Riepe wrote: > > David Timms wrote: > Because dvbcut hasn't been ported to qt4 yet? > >> Reason I ask is that my rpm package builds against qt-devel. On a >> Fedora 8 machine this equated to QT3, on F9 it equates to QT4. >> >> Since on F9, the rpm build works, and operates OK, it seems like the QT3 >> version requirement on http://dvbcut.sourceforge.net/installation.html >> is perhaps not really a requirement, perhaps it was just in case QT4 >> development broke compatibility with functions used in QT3 ? Actually, further investigation shows that the qt3-devel package has a virtual provides of qt-devel, so when my dvbcut package build-requires qt-devel, this is actually satisfied by qt3-devel, and hence I am really pulling in the qt3 include/headers after all: {on a Fedora 9 machine}. $ rpm -q --provides qt-devel libarthurplugin.so libcontainerextension.so libcustomwidgetplugin.so libqt3supportwidgets.so libtaskmenuextension.so libworldtimeclockplugin.so qt4-designer = 4.3.5-2.fc9 qt4-devel = 4.3.5-2.fc9 qt-devel = 1:4.3.5-2.fc9
$ rpm -q --provides qt3-devel qt-devel = 1:3.3.8b-12.fc9 qt3-devel = 3.3.8b-12.fc9 > Does that mean that you can compile dvbcut on F9 without any changes? Do > you use scons or configure? scons. After removing qt3-devel, I can no longer build. At first glance it looks like there would be a fair amount of work to make it possible to build against qt4-devel. Cheers, DaveT. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ DVBCUT-user mailing list DVBCUT-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dvbcut-user
