"Dan Lipsitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 9/13/06, Stefan Reichör <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> You are right, we should not depend on this dependency. However, bzr >> is the best way to get dvc - so it should not be a problem in practice. > > I think depending on bzr for builds is a bad idea because it may > inhibit packaging by distros and will make building from a tarball > more difficult. It may also scare off non-bzr users who want to use > dvc.
This is obviously true. But we are spending very few time on DVC at the moment (busy personal life, motivation, ...). So, I prefer improving the functionalities than the packaging with the little time I spend on it. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
