Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Christian Ohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Committing from the diff buffer has questionable utility since you >>> can just as easily use the status buffer to commit. And it creates >>> the problems I described. It's a good candidate for removal. >> >> I'd like to have the feedback of other DVC users and developers, but >> to me, the "diff/edit-log/commit" cycle *is* the most meaningfull. So, >> you're indeed proposing to remove what is the most usefull thing to me >> in DVC.
I use the same cycle: M-x dvc-diff M-x dvc-log-edit M-x dvc-log-edit-done > I always commit straight from the log-edit buffer. Unless there are > only a subset of files that I wish to commit, in which case I do it by > hand. I suppose I ought to learn how to narrow the subset via dired or > the status buffer someday. You can narrow down this list easily by marking the relevant files in the diff buffer. Stefan. _______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
