Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to be able to present a 1.0 release to RMS at some point in
> January 2008 so that I can try to get it accepted into Emacs.
Good idea. It can help me to get motivation to invest more time in DVC
too ;-).
> It feels like we're pretty close to 1.0-quality. What do others think?
>
> Here are some things that might need work before 1.0 that come to mind:
>
> - Tips need to mention DVC, not Xtla.
> - Massage the manual in various ways.
> - (If it's ready) Merge in stephe's status/diff-related branch -- I
> don't recall what this was, exactly
> - Get Darcs backend to be more functional; if I recall correctly, this
> one was lagging behind the others.
Something we've always had on our TODO-list, which we never completed:
- Remove tla-* code from dvc*.el files.
- Remove all dependancies from dvc*.el files to tla*.el
Currently,
$ grep tla dvc*.el | grep -v autoload | wc -l
146
:-(
> - Rewriting dvc-log to be asynchronous (not enough time on my part, and
> it's still fast enough so as to not annoy me).
This has one consequence : currently, we have two distinct hg-log
implementation. One within the DVC framework, with the DVC-related
features, and one standalone, faster, but not integrated in DVC.
It would be nice to have the DVC version as fast as the other before
we drop it, and it would be rather bad to have two hg-log in our 1.0.
Anyway, we definitely need to get into a numbered-release cycle, we
can start with a 0.9, as a symbolic step.
--
Matthieu
_______________________________________________
Dvc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
