Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Indeed, the simple nomenclature of "add" >> versus "staging" had me scratching my head for ages while trying to >> understand how dvc worked. > > That's mostly because DVC started by tla and then bzr support, and Git > is different from the others so hardly fits in a very generic > framework.
I think this is my point. The interface is possibly not generic enough and therefore partly might miss its primary design goal. Lets see when the branching UI is there and is working. Most other things do well and I like it a lot. > > On the staging/add nomenclature, for info, there are discussions to > clarify this in Git's CLI (adding git stage/git unstage commands): > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/99467 Yes - but not in the DVC interface. Which is one reason I am constructing my tutorial as I learn DVC. -- important and urgent problems of the technology of today are no longer the satisfactions of the primary needs or of archetypal wishes, but the reparation of the evils and damages by the technology of yesterday. ~Dennis Gabor, Innovations: Scientific, Technological and Social, 1970 _______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
