Jürgen Spitzmüller skrev:
Also sprach Jan-Åke Larsson:
Possibly dvips understands "B" as "bind def", I do not know. There is
certainly no header included in your file that defines "B".
Hm, I just saw that dvips-generated postscript files usually contain
definitions like
begin/N{def}def/B{bind def}N
I am not familar with PostScript, but doesn't that mean that "B" is defined as
an alias to "bind def" by dvips? Thus, the code in the pgf file would be
valid, wouldn't it?
Yes and no. The code is provided for the dvips driver, to make
Postscript out of DVI. However, there are other drivers around that take
dvips-intended DVIs and displays them. This includes dvipng and xdvi.
I could arrange for dvipng to include the correct incanatation to make
this work, but that would not fix xdvi's problem. I think it is better
to fix this closer to the source.
Cheers,
Jan-Åke
_______________________________________________
Dvipng mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dvipng
