Denise Paolucci wrote: > In other words, it's as-closely replicating the behavior of LJ's > visibility model as is possible with the change to the system. You'll > know who possibly *could* be reading the friend's post that you're > reading, but you won't know for sure if it's filtered to a more restrictive > subset or not unless the user chooses to disclose this fact. >
Hi everyone, New to the list, I'm blithespirit on LJ. :) I just wanted to request a clarification of the above. One of my gripes with the current LJ filtered post system is that when I post to a filtered group (for example, work friends), the name of that filtered list is displayed on the post. I don't think it's optimal for a group name I use (internally) to categorise 'friends' groups necessarily be displayed to members of that group, although I can understand having the *option* to display the name of the custom list to people. ie - this is my custom list for work chat, so you can speak freely, or something like that. I'm not sure if this is something being addressed by DW or not? I take it from Denise's comment that I've quoted that you're trying to keep 'visibility' pretty close to the current LJ setup. Thanks, Sarah _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
