:( Man! I meant to say, you're right, I'm wrong. I stand down.
Sorry about the double email, everybody. :( On 4/16/09, Wahiaronkwas David <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok. You're I stand down. > > On 4/16/09, Azalais Aranxta <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Wahiaronkwas David wrote: >> >>> (For the record, even if an auto-collapse or auto-cut were instituted, >>> I wouldn't consider it censorship. An unnecessary pain in the ass to >>> write around and disproportionately beneficial to people who do *not* >>> want to read what I've written, maybe, but not censorship.) >>> >>> ~ Rachel >>> >>> I wasn't calling the lengthy entry auto cut censorship, rather the >>> removing Twitter automatically thing. Just a clarification. I hope. >> >> Censorship is a very strong word. Allowing people to remove >> Twitter from their reading lists on a journal service is not >> depriving them of their civil right to free expression. >> >> YMMV IMNSHO and so on. >> > _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
