> Well, perhaps I was exceeding my authority, or we have a different > definition of "assurances", but I recall asking in a meeting whether > the assignment for Go was firm and could be used by Ian without fear > of collision. With Ron's confirmation that the new number had been > added to the draft document, I was confident enough to give the > go-ahead.
Unsurprisingly, my memory is totally unreliable. With a little digging through old email, I see that I was instead recalling an earlier discussion about DW_LANG_Python, which we added late in the DWARF-4 process -- late enough that the DWARF-4 spec was nearly cast in stone at the point I gave a go-ahead to use the assigned value. Apologies for clouding the discussion! -cary _______________________________________________ Dwarf-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
