> > It appears that DW_LNAME_HIP, proposed in 230120.4, never got > incorporated into the DWARF working document (so there is no duplication). > Perhaps because the Issue status is "Code Assigned" rather than Approved. > That status really only applies to the V5 code assignment actually. > > Anyway, I'll fix it for V6. > > The next available code is 0x0027. What makes you think the code should be > 0x0029? > > > I was looking at https://dwarfstd.org/languages-v6.html where the last > assigned langiage is DW_LNAME_Hylo 0x0028. >
DW_LANG_HIP/DW_LNAME_HIP was assigned first, but for some reason, the list was out of order, so when I assigned DW_LNAME_Assembly, it looked like 0x001c was the last code assigned. I think it would be safer to reassign DW_LNAME_Assembly as 0x0029. -cary
-- Dwarf-discuss mailing list Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss