>
> It appears that DW_LNAME_HIP, proposed in 230120.4,  never got
> incorporated into the DWARF working document (so there is no duplication).
> Perhaps because the Issue status is "Code Assigned" rather than Approved.
> That status really only applies to the V5 code assignment actually.
>
> Anyway, I'll fix it for V6.
>
> The next available code is 0x0027. What makes you think the code should be
> 0x0029?
>
>
> I was looking at https://dwarfstd.org/languages-v6.html where the last
> assigned langiage is DW_LNAME_Hylo 0x0028.
>

DW_LANG_HIP/DW_LNAME_HIP was assigned first, but for some reason, the list
was out of order, so when I assigned DW_LNAME_Assembly, it looked like
0x001c was the last code assigned. I think it would be safer to reassign
DW_LNAME_Assembly as 0x0029.

-cary
-- 
Dwarf-discuss mailing list
Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org
https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss

Reply via email to