On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:31:44PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 06:35:32PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:04:20PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:27:47PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote: > > > > * Leonhard Scherer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061122 16:18]: > > > > > > > > > > I got very much the same opinion like you, Anselm; but I really miss > > > > > the > > > > > togglemax-view feature :/ > > > > > > > > > > Maximizing to a specific tag is very uncomfortable, I think, so I > > > > > would > > > > > really like to have the titlebars removed and the togglemax inserted > > > > > again. > > > > > > > > I have the same opinion and added the togglemax from dwm-0.<something> > > > > myself, also removed titlebars (just not draw them (thanks Anselm for > > > > more correct solution, I'll use it now)) > > > > > > So will togglemax come back due to popular demand? :) > > > > No, because it is zoom in floating mode/for floating clients. > > That's how it was implemented? Because the behavior is different, some > windows (notably shells and emacs), don't maximize completely in > floating mode. Then again, this might be a separate issue...
That's because floating mode respects incremental resizals. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
