Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 03:35:38PM +0100, Leonhard Scherer wrote:
What I want to say is this:
Don't blow up the code of DWM; why don't you just use patches for your
special needs? The simpler DWM stays the easier is it for Anselm to code
it and for other people to expand the code.
If you check hg tip, you'll notice that the source is smaller
than in dwm-2.2 ;)
Regards,
Gooood :D
Since you are the developer, could you just tell us, what you gonna do?
As everybody can see, there are the two kinds of opinions: The ones who
want to keep at least most of the features and the ones who don't. ;)
How do you see DWM in the future? More features? Less features?
In which direction will DWM go?
Leo
