On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:13:00PM +0000, David Tweed wrote: > Key points: (1) the tags array on a client is Bool, so we have 4 bytes used, > so > making an explicit int doesn't increase space reqs. > (2) Any tagging operation eventually calls arrange(), which does at least one > walk through full client list, so adding an additional scan here and there > doesn't > change asymptotic complexity.
This is an interesting idea, however, since it only works predictable for singly-viewed tags, I don't consider this for mainstream dwm. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
