Hi!
Allowing windows to exist without any tags at all seems like a bad idea to me. In what view should they appear? All or none?
The idea is to tag them to the selected tag, when the user views a tag again.
As I said before, dwm without view() is a bad idea. I don't see anything wrong when it's possible to view no tag. 2006/11/30, Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 11/30/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here we go. Gottox proposed to get rid of view(), and letting > toggleview() do the work instead. This can be achieved through > allowing that no tag is viewed. This results in the side-effect > that during toggleview() clients with no tags at all (which > appeared during the time when no tag was viewed and which > haven't been matched with any rule) have to be tagged with the > new tag. Allowing windows to exist without any tags at all seems like a bad idea to me. In what view should they appear? All or none? Both seem wrong, and just tagging them with the first tag that is viewed after they appeared isn't really clean either. Besides, the ability to select just one tag for viewing is probably the quickest way to "restructure" your view from scratch, I'd realy miss that. Greetings, Sander.
-- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)
