On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:41:45PM +0000, David Tweed wrote: > functionality. I do this in my stuff by pushing/popping to temporary tags, > but if you're thinking about stuff from the foundations then considering > whether there's a better way to acheive this "temporary subset" effect.
One would need some mark() function, so that tag-based things like toggletag() and tag() would have effect on such a set instead. But I think it would mean overhead, because if I go to mark() a client I can already tag() it differently, so the concept would get more complex... Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
