On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 09:51:17AM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:28:01PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 08:01:15AM +1300, Karl. wrote: > > > I wondered if the tag-used indicator could be an underline instead, to > > > reduce the load on my aging brain? Or something else, maybe - I'm not > > > convinced that an underline is a better option than dots - I'd just like > > > something more different from the client-tag dots. > > > > I noticed the same and got an idea, will present it tomorrow! > > This is my favorit: > http://www.suckless.org/shots/indicator_proposal.png > > The dot indicates that this tag contains any clients, the border > indicates the tags of the focused client.
I got a new favorit: http://www.suckless.org/shots/proposal2.png With this in mind, I'd move the point to bottom right, and change the semantic: dot: tags of client pseudo-3d: tag contains clients Any complains? Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
