Diego Biurrun --> dwm (2007-01-25 13:25:34 +0100): > Sorry for butting in late, but .. > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:37:30PM +0100, Jukka Salmi wrote: > > Anselm R. Garbe --> dwm (2007-01-18 13:21:11 +0100): > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:58:54PM +0100, Javier wrote: > > > > Hi there, > > > > I'm subscribed to the suckless hackers mail list and I think it could > > > > be great if hg changes mails include the patch of each revision. Is it > > > > possible? Am I the only person who thinks it's a good idea? > > > > > > What do others think about this proposal? > > > > Hmm, and if the changes are huge? I don't think this is a good idea... > > Huge changes on a small program? How?
"Small" in reference to lines of program code is probably greater than "small" in reference to lines of an email message... > > The commit mail already includes the revision number, thus it's easy > > enough to get the patch (cd $dwm; hg log -r$rev -p). > > But this way nobody can discuss and comment on the patch. Review is not > going to take place. BS. I don't know of any project that includes the actual diffs with their commit messages. Nevertheless changes referenced in these commit messages are discussed and reviewed. Regards, Jukka -- bashian roulette: $ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~
