On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:39:14PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote: > > extern Layout *lt; points to the current layout in use, > > so all occurences of arrange(); have been replaced with > > lt->arrange();, lt->symbol points to the symbol of the layout. > > > > Consequently I renamed all occurences of mode into layout now > > (bmw has been renamed to blw for instance). > > if you could explain, cause I don't know why you choose identifiers like > `lt' which IMHO don't really speak for themself, instead of just taking > `layout' which are only 4 letters more? > > I think using `layout' provides so much more information for so less more > costs. Why shouldn't we invest that penny?
I'll think about it. -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361