On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:39:14PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> > extern Layout *lt; points to the current layout in use,
> > so all occurences of arrange(); have been replaced with
> > lt->arrange();, lt->symbol points to the symbol of the layout.
> >
> > Consequently I renamed all occurences of mode into layout now
> > (bmw has been renamed to blw for instance).
> 
> if you could explain, cause I don't know why you choose identifiers like
> `lt' which IMHO don't really speak for themself, instead of just taking
> `layout' which are only 4 letters more?
> 
> I think using `layout' provides so much more information for so less more
> costs. Why shouldn't we invest that penny?

I'll think about it.

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Reply via email to