There's toolkit released for making Arch live/install cds - it's called larch
On 3/14/07, Callan Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As much as I like Debian/Ubuntu I'd second Arch as well. It provides all the tools required for compilation as a base, it would take a few minutes to create some sort of suckless-tools dummy package, has a simple and fairly vanilla configuration base and it has every application you've listed to be installed by default in its repositories. The only thing I see taking a while is a new livecd/install cd, but it couldn't be any harder than creating a new Ubuntu one. On 3/14/07, Stalwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Slackware (and its forks), Crux (and its forks including ArchLinux) > and source-based distros (gentoo, smgl) rule because they're simple > (well, except gentoo). Debian is too automated and has (imho) too much > strange scripts. ArchLinux minimal install is ~100Mb, but full > dwm-environment can be <250Mb. Same with slack > > > On 3/14/07, Michael Muster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I, don't see a reason why it is necessary to start a new distribution. > > If you install a minimal debian by selecting nothing when tasksel > > asks, you get a minimal system where everyone can install what he/she > > wants. > > For an minimal dwm-system an > > aptitude install x-window-system-core and a few > > x-libs to compile dwm should work. > > Perhaps add build-essential, xterm, and an editor and the system is > > ready for use. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > -- Callan Barrett
