All distros have same hardware support, only default configuration differs. For example: ubuntu's default xorg.conf contains section for wacom tablet which makes it work out of box, but most users don't have wacom.
ArchLinux is following KISS philosophy - it contains only basic configuration by default, like udev rules. Default configuration files usually are very basic, but well commented. On 3/28/07, Julian Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/27/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, I think ubuntu is the right base to depend on, I like > arch, but for several reasons ubuntu seems to be more > advantageous regarding hardware support - also I'm used to > ubuntu/debian. +1 for arch latest beta 0.8 has a great hw support (don't know how it compares with Debian, when speaking about bloated distros I'm a gentoo guy) -- Julián
