Oops, sorry for the noise O:) replying mails from the mobile after getting some beers is not a good idea.
--pancake > I think this patch is not necessary because cflags can be changed by > providing our desired value as an argument for make: > > $ make CFLAGS=-w > > btw the use of ?= in cflags is recommended. > >> Thank you, I applied all your changes. >> >> Regards, >> Anselm >> >> On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 05:37:35PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Hi, >>> created simply patch that somewhat cleanup r874 (actual tip). >>> >>> URL: >>> http://na.srck.net/dwm/dwm-r874-cleanup.patch >>> >>> Stats: >>> client.c | 14 ++++++++++---- >>> dwm.h | 1 + >>> event.c | 3 +-- >>> layout.c | 15 ++++----------- >>> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >>> >>> It creates new function: >>> +focustopvisible(void) { >>> + Client *c; >>> + >>> + for(c = stack; c && !isvisible(c); c = c->snext); >>> + focus(c); >>> >>> and replaces all ocurrances of that selection&focus loops in dwm code >>> >>> and second thing cleaned up ;) was removing of code in layout.c/zoom >>> which simply do nothing: >>> - for(n = 0, c = nexttiled(clients); c; c = nexttiled(c->next)) >>> - n++; >>> >>> but n was never used in func. zoom. >>> >>> --anydot >>> >> >> -- >> Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361 >> >> > > > >
