I dislike {H|V}ratio, but I think NMASTER is a good option. I use it
once in a while.
On 8/9/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 03:08:56PM +0200, pancake wrote:
> > Hi, i have finally patched my dwm with the latests mercurial
> > changes. and this is my config:
> >
> > { MODKEY, XK_h, inchratio,
> > ".1" }, \
> > { MODKEY, XK_l, inchratio,
> > "-.1" }, \
> > { MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_h, inchratio,
> > ".2" }, \
> > { MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_l, inchratio,
> > "-.2" }, \
> > { MODKEY|ControlMask, XK_j, incvratio,
> > "-.1" }, \
> > { MODKEY|ControlMask, XK_k, incvratio,
> > ".1" }, \
> > { MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_j, incnmaster, "1"
> > }, \
> > { MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_k, incnmaster,
> > "-1" }, \
> >
> > The acceleration with inchratio is really soft and cool . Nice hit. But i
> > would like
> > to be able to make the masterw smaller than the possible with the inchratio
> > approach.
> >
> > These limits makes dwm look more claustrofobic. :)
> >
> > But i hardly dislike the incvmaster failsafe that makes clients dissapear
> > from
> > the view. This breaks the dwm basics and makes the environment more
> > confusing.
> >
> > I would remove this. or at least make it optional, but adopting the
> > clientspertag
> > patch youll get a similar effect without collateral damages and with a more
> > flexible
> > approach. Please consider it.
>
> Actually, more and more I come to the same conclusion. The ratio
> stuff just feels wrong. I also think the NMASTER thing feels
> wrong and should/might be removed.
>
> What is the impression of others regarding this?
>
> Regards,
> --
> Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
>
>
--
# Kurt H Maier
