Hi, it is true, that I use dwm tiled layout only for handling my terminals. Everywhere else it doesn't feel good, so I usually use either floating mode or else just one client per tag.
Now, you guys made me interested in screen and if I switch to it for console handling, I won't need the tile layout at all! That is certainly an interesting progress in using this _tiled_ window manager :-) Regards, Marek I've read about the vertical patch, but I am not sure, whetr On 8/10/07, markus schnalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For those of you guys, who use nmaster for having two terminal windows > > one above the other just use screen(1)'s split function. It's very > > practical and so much simpler than fiddling with nmaster and trying to > > get correct windows where intended. > > Right! > I use GNU screen for about 1/3 of the window managing stuff > > __ > > > May I remind you to keep dwm simple. > I read the mailinglist constantly although I still use dwm-3.5. And I > can tell you, that some of the features that were discussed in the last > weeks are a bit confusing for people who don't use them. > (Wasn't there someone who said, that features that are not simple to > describe should be removed?) > > Okay, this certainly has to do with the fact that I only use max-layout > and mostly terms with screen. (And only 2 workspace-like tags to toggle) > > So I don't use most of the dwm features and I don't need them ... > perhaps some features are really not important at all?! > > > just what I wanted to say about how I felt by following the discussion > > > markus > > (for myself this all makes no big difference, I'll use my setup anyway) > >
