On (10/08/07 18:56), Enno Gottox Boland wrote: > I think this would decrease code quality. It's a nice idea, but I > can't see any advantage when using one big function with a huge number > of lines and inteprete every crap over handle it by extra function > which will do it in the way but with cleaner code. > > 2007/8/10, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > ... I believe that all lt->arrange !=/== checks only belong to > > the layout function, which means that layout-specific functions > > like togglemax(), zoom() should be handled by the argument to the > > specific arrange function. > > >
Yeah, I think the same and another evil is imho using that static variables in layout functions. I (personaly) DON'T see this as simplification as there were lost a lot of code beauty on it (same goes to decision to subsitute union args by char*). (all is IMHO :) -- Premysl "Anydot" Hruby >> http://na.srck.net <<
