On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:02:50AM +0000, Chris Webb wrote: > "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If we decide for line-based input reading, one easily could > > block dwm from further event processing through running > > > > echo -n foo | dwm > > > > I think that'd be a big disadvantage. > > It could append read text to the end of stext[] whenever it successfully > reads(), except that the first character after a '\n' clears stext[] and > starts a new status. It needn't block.
That is true. Well I consider this as a solution. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
