On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 05:11:01PM +0100, pancake wrote:
> I feel that the swap() function of awesome is really useful,
> and imho should be implemented into the dwm base. With
> swapnext() and swapprev(). Does anybody have tested
> this functionality?
To me swap seems unnecessary, because you can achieve the same
functionality through using zoom() for re-arranging the clients
as you like. zoom() implicitely pops the focused client.
A swap{prev,next}() would make the interface more complicated
imho, and which keybinding is still free that would work well as
swap() binding?
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
