Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2007-12-06, 09:54): > > > This way, when I do a total mess with tagging and floating my clients > > > (sometimes it happens and I get lost) I could get my everyday dwm state > > > with one keystroke or command.
> Well, the only thing which is missing that dwm keeps state of > the currently selected tags. The idea is that dwm putenv's the > currently selected tags whenever they change and a newly spawned > dwm instance looks for that environment variable and pre-selects > those tags. Then a clean restart will behave like reapplying all > tagging rules beside persisting the selected tags. Hi, this is possibly a cool idea, but it contradicts a little my cleanup/tidyup idea, as described in the quoting above yours. I think that a function (however implemented) brining back a pristine state of dwm and the clients (rules reapplied, viewing only tag one, or some other defafult (but default, not inherited)) is what I'd expect from a tidyup function. As to the minilanguage I also agree it should stay out. What do you think? Regards, -- [a]
signature.asc
Description: Podpis cyfrowy :: Digital signature
