> > You should use "Desktop" instead. > > > > The problem is that this rule is ignored :// > > I bet the desktop fullscreen window has set the > override_redirect hint. Check with > ; xwininfo | grep Redirect > If that's the case.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xwininfo xwininfo: Window id: 0xa0001d "Escritorio" Absolute upper-left X: 0 Absolute upper-left Y: 736 Relative upper-left X: 0 Relative upper-left Y: 736 Width: 512 Height: 32 Depth: 24 Visual Class: TrueColor Border width: 0 Class: InputOutput Colormap: 0x20 (installed) Bit Gravity State: NorthWestGravity Window Gravity State: NorthWestGravity Backing Store State: NotUseful Save Under State: no Map State: IsViewable Override Redirect State: no Corners: +0+736 -512+736 -512-0 +0-0 -geometry 512x32+0-0 It doesn't :/ > [..] > > Not only for gnome, but this way we can provide hybrid environment with > > tiled desktop and menubar and will be compatible with any available desktop > > environment or menu implementation. > > The problem with this is extensive use of EWMH, and I don't want > to clutter dwm with this. I think Gnome is nothing for dwm > users. Same with the other environments. > ;) > > If you really want them co-exist, go with Xnest the one or the > other way, or with two differently concurrently running X > servers. Hehe, i just wanted to express my experience with this weird mixture. I understand that joining both worlds is not a clean design and I understand your comments. I find dwm a nice environment for experimentating with usability and having this mix can make non-tiled users to see how productives are these environments. But I see this as an experiment. Just to see how a 'normal' or ignorant user interacts with a computer with a tiled window manager just observing how they try to manage the environment. This way it's possible to fix and learn new ways for dwm and bring some experimental ideas. I just want to play O:) --pancake
