Joerg van den Hoff dixit (2008-02-14, 13:53): > I only see this with `xterm'. `urxvt' behaves more benign. and > is a much nicer terminal emulator (smaller, faster, unicode support, etc.) > than `xterm' in my opinion.
xterm also supports unicode and has a number of unique features (albeit rarely used), but yes, I also use urxvt and find it pretty much perfect for my needs. Best, -- [a]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
